|
Post by mr potatohead on Apr 4, 2023 8:46:27 GMT
Anyone suggesting less guns is a good idea is also retarded, because 1. They don't understand the issue. 2. The number of inanimate objects is irrelevant to a problem that involves behaviors, mental health and, possibly IMO, intentional drugging by operatives who wish to create some drama theater to advance the disarming of those who might oppose the oppressors in a brave, new world.
In Ohio, the schools who have opted to take advantage of the Ohio state's ruling that they can arm opt-in teachers and other staff, who wish to participate, with a State Police level firearms safety and skills qualification, are not seeing any of these mentally ill wack jobs in their schools. So, yes, it is proven to work, just like it works at CNN, Oprah''s houses and for NWO dignitaries. When Ohio enacted the law, they advertised it widely on media too, so it's nice to know that some states, like Ohio, really and truly do care about the children and people who live there.
|
|
lardy
Caneguru
Posts: 576
|
Post by lardy on Apr 4, 2023 9:32:43 GMT
Anyone suggesting less guns is a good idea is also retarded, because 1. They don't understand the issue. 2. The number of inanimate objects is irrelevant to a problem that involves behaviors, mental health and, possibly IMO, intentional drugging by operatives who wish to create some drama theater to advance the disarming of those who might oppose the oppressors in a brave, new world. In Ohio, the schools who have opted to take advantage of the Ohio state's ruling that they can arm opt-in teachers and other staff, who wish to participate, with a State Police level firearms safety and skills qualification, are not seeing any of these mentally ill wack jobs in their schools. So, yes, it is proven to work, just like it works at CNN, Oprah''s houses and for NWO dignitaries. When Ohio enacted the law, they advertised it widely on media too, so it's nice to know that some states, like Ohio, really and truly do care about the children and people who live there. It was just a bit of tongue in cheek because of how crazy it is that this good man feels the need to create shields to protect children in their place of education - should be the safest place on earth. You realize the would be oppressors have drones and jets, artillery, naval forces etc. Militia would be a thorn in the side, sure but the battles already over. The human race handed their powers over to the governments a long time ago and we're all just paying for that decision, Chad and his mossberg hardly gonna cause the New world powers any issues. Public opinion is the only way to defeat the powers now unfortunately and that will never happen unless people are willing to learn and understand eachother but that will never happen anyway. Also I've already said in a country armed to it's teeth there should be no "gun free zones" and it makes a lot of sense that Ohio has seen a lesser occurrence of said issues, it still doesn't fix the issue as a whole, like i said it was tongue in cheek and I actually agree if no ones willing to give up guns because they like guns (the only reason for having a gun btw) then the schools should be protected but looking at the avg salary of security in the US i'm not sure id be willing to go toe to toe with a psycho wielding the ridiculous weapons available to them.
|
|
lardy
Caneguru
Posts: 576
|
Post by lardy on Apr 4, 2023 9:42:07 GMT
"Police officers, firefighters and security guards have the highest rates of obesity of all professions, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of data from the American Journal of Preventive Medicine. According to the Journal, 40.7% of police, firefighters and security guards are obese." Don't worry kids.
|
|
lardy
Caneguru
Posts: 576
|
Post by lardy on Apr 4, 2023 10:11:05 GMT
Can we all just agree, everyone should feel safe when attending school? That goes for the mental warfare being waged on our children from the Government pushing ideologies such as the Woke movement, LGBT+ etc. I have 2 nieces and 3 Nephews, 4 2nd cousins all in Elementary school in the state of Utah, I've had this conversation many a time and still haven't heard good enough solutions to the problem the children and parents are facing in schools, it's honestly a shame it just can't be sorted.
|
|
|
Post by mr potatohead on Apr 4, 2023 10:21:36 GMT
..... You realize the would be oppressors have drones and jets, artillery, naval forces etc. Militia would be a thorn in the side, sure but the battles already over. The human race handed their powers over to the governments a long time ago and we're all just paying for that decision, Chad and his mossberg hardly gonna cause the New world powers any issues. Public opinion is the only way to defeat the powers now unfortunately and that will never happen unless people are willing to learn and understand each other but that will never happen anyway. ..... If you decide you might like to drop that negative, loser's attitude, perhaps a good place to start would be to read 1 Samuel chapter 17.
|
|
|
Post by Magnus on Apr 4, 2023 11:44:35 GMT
"Police officers, firefighters and security guards have the highest rates of obesity of all professions, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of data from the American Journal of Preventive Medicine. According to the Journal, 40.7% of police, firefighters and security guards are obese." At the administrative and 'chief' level yes, but other than that I can't remember the last time I've seen an "obese" NYC fireman ?...
|
|
|
Post by mr potatohead on Apr 4, 2023 13:12:11 GMT
No one wins anything - contests, sports events of any kind, fights of any kind, propaganda campaigns, wars, overcoming fear, etc, etc, when they believe they are beaten before they start. The tools of oppression, drones, arms, planes, technology, etc, etc, are not directly manufactured or controlled by the oppressors. They are controlled by your relatives, friends and others who are just common people with a job and a family. If you believe in the fantasy propaganda of fear, whether it comes from another source or it's just in your head, you will lose, no matter what the contest is.
|
|
lardy
Caneguru
Posts: 576
|
Post by lardy on Apr 4, 2023 14:51:11 GMT
..... You realize the would be oppressors have drones and jets, artillery, naval forces etc. Militia would be a thorn in the side, sure but the battles already over. The human race handed their powers over to the governments a long time ago and we're all just paying for that decision, Chad and his mossberg hardly gonna cause the New world powers any issues. Public opinion is the only way to defeat the powers now unfortunately and that will never happen unless people are willing to learn and understand each other but that will never happen anyway. ..... If you decide you might like to drop that negative, loser's attitude, perhaps a good place to start would be to read 1 Samuel chapter 17. I think it's more of a realistic view, I would always stand opposite the "Powers that be" if it was them against us but I'm not foolish enough to think I can beat them via violence. Surely there's a story in the same book for winning battles without using violence, more so when it is the wisest decision. Look man chill out I don't want to take your guns, I just think they're unnecessary instruments of destruction, I'm not a huge fan of nuclear weapons as well but I have seen with my own eyes the deterrent factor working successfully so I don't moan too much even if it does have the capability to kill millions/billions of innocent people. In the country with the most guns there is by FAR the most mass events of murder and harm (at least in the west) i'd say the deterrent has failed at this point.
|
|
|
Post by mr potatohead on Apr 4, 2023 16:52:02 GMT
If you decide you might like to drop that negative, loser's attitude, perhaps a good place to start would be to read 1 Samuel chapter 17. I think it's more of a realistic view, I would always stand opposite the "Powers that be" if it was them against us but I'm not foolish enough to think I can beat them via violence. Surely there's a story in the same book for winning battles without using violence, more so when it is the wisest decision.
Look man chill out I don't want to take your guns, I just think they're unnecessary instruments of destruction, I'm not a huge fan of nuclear weapons as well but I have seen with my own eyes the deterrent factor working successfully so I don't moan too much even if it does have the capability to kill millions/billions of innocent people. In the country with the most guns there is by FAR the most mass events of murder and harm (at least in the west) i'd say the deterrent has failed at this point. Yes, no need to be aggressively violent. I was responding mainly to the comments in bold above. With that attitude, a person is defeated before they begin. This is a main purpose of propaganda. Give up before you start. That's for losers. I then went on to explain that the PTB are not the ones flying the planes or firing the guns. The ones doing that are us. Are you worried that your mom, dad, children, friends or other common people with families are going to bomb you? Are you worried that people who don't have the discipline or intelligence needed to stay out of prison are going to control high-tech weaponry? Not me. Are you aware that, aside from listing the myriad and varied abundance of just firearm shooting sports (it's a huge list, m8), not to mention other "instruments of destruction" like slingshot, archery, javelin, etc, that there are 15 shooting sports using three firearm "instruments of destruction"; pistol, rifle and shotgun, in the Olympics alone? Then there are people who rely on "instruments of destruction" as their exclusive means to put meat on the table. Plus, control of destructive rodents and varmints, poisonous snakes, protection from predators, etc, using "instruments of destruction". How many sports events revolve around the use of nuclear weapons? Are nuclear weapons viable for hunting or protection from predators or poisonous snakes? If you're going to focus on a "realistic view", OK, but please be consistent? A weapon or "instrument of destruction" is defined by the use of an object - like ball bats, frying pans, kitchen knives and hammers - which, combined, kill 5x as many people per year as rifles, BTW. Many more children drown in swimming pools every year than die from bullets. Do we eliminate swimming pools? Or ..... how about we eliminate MDs or vehicles? Do you want me to list the crazy stats on deaths from those compared to guns?
|
|
|
Post by mr potatohead on Apr 4, 2023 18:30:27 GMT
BTW, lardy, thanks for hanging in here and not just running away, like the "bye" boys. I appreciate it, m8.
Here's a video of an event that is centered around shooting sports:
Do you think these guys and gals don't also own modern firearms? I'd guess 100% they do and they know how to shoot safely and, more or less, accurately.
|
|
lardy
Caneguru
Posts: 576
|
Post by lardy on Apr 4, 2023 21:58:24 GMT
BTW, lardy, thanks for hanging in here and not just running away, like the "bye" boys. I appreciate it, m8. Here's a video of an event that is centered around shooting sports: Do you think these guys and gals don't also own modern firearms? I'd guess 100% they do and they know how to shoot safely and, more or less, accurately. You're welcome and thanks for all the information you have shared I've learnt some things, I'm sure they do, I partake in shooting for sport once a year or so with clay pigeon shooting and as a kid I used to be a "beater" for pheasant shoots. I have nothing against people who own a gun for such things 99% of them are at least reasonable people and if you aren't on private land with all sorts of insurances you can't carry the guns. It works. Not a problem with shooting for sport as long as it ain't people or safari animals
|
|
|
Post by Capt America on Apr 4, 2023 22:07:17 GMT
On the open battlefield the populace could never stand against a military. Also, the idea that the military won't fire on civilians is something they already thought of and have been purging the ranks for a few years now with "dog whistle" tests like the Covid vax, wokeism allegiance, or other things they use to figure out how you probably voted. Combine that with letting non-citizens serve. There would be no hesitation for the military to fire on civilians. The battle can't be one of bullets. It will have to be digital or something like that. Perhaps AI will be involved, it will definitely be used by the State to control us, so ways must be found to poison their well. Targeted high profile "eliminations" would need to be a part of it. You have to cut off the head of the snake, and that's what D.C. is now.
|
|
|
Post by mr potatohead on Apr 5, 2023 1:25:21 GMT
Like Ret LTC Ivan Raklin, here's another ex-military that I suspect has the same attitude; "I'm either going to win - OR - I'm not going to lose". $$$ can't buy that attitude for real.
|
|
|
Post by BigBruvOfEnglandUK on Apr 5, 2023 6:51:28 GMT
Here's a video of an event that is centered around shooting sports: That was great to watch, Spud m8!
|
|
|
Post by I. Brow Mann on Apr 5, 2023 8:54:21 GMT
On the open battlefield the populace could never stand against a military. Also, the idea that the military won't fire on civilians is something they already thought of and have been purging the ranks for a few years now with "dog whistle" tests like the Covid vax, wokeism allegiance, or other things they use to figure out how you probably voted. Combine that with letting non-citizens serve. There would be no hesitation for the military to fire on civilians. The battle can't be one of bullets. It will have to be digital or something like that. Perhaps AI will be involved, it will definitely be used by the State to control us, so ways must be found to poison their well. Targeted high profile "eliminations" would need to be a part of it. You have to cut off the head of the snake, and that's what D.C. is now. "Open battlefield"? I think the Tories and Red Coats demonstrated the futility of that about 250 years ago. If the tyrant was unafraid there would be no need to constantly hammer away about "gun control", would there? BTW, "assault weapon" is not defined by the design or appearance of an object. It is defined by its use. If someone uses a hammer to initiate an attack at you, that hammer is an assault weapon. Whatever a perp has in his or her hand, used to initiate an attack on someone, becomes an "assault weapon" by virtue of the use it's being put to. An object or tool used for hunting or recreation, regardless of its appearance, is not an "assault weapon", or even a "weapon" at all, since it is not being used to attack humans. It is only a tool that is suitable and/or effective for whatever activity in which one is engaged. Many things we use every day were originally designed for military because they served well in their function (Spam, anyone?). Mama's "assault weapon" of choice may be a rolling pin or iron skillet, right?
|
|