moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,378
|
Post by moxohol on Mar 23, 2024 17:49:25 GMT
|
|
moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,378
|
Post by moxohol on Mar 25, 2024 14:16:47 GMT
Wish I could say the same about being a canuck or rhodie?
|
|
|
Post by BigBruvOfEnglandUK on Mar 26, 2024 19:26:31 GMT
It's eugenics, m8.
|
|
moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,378
|
Post by moxohol on Mar 27, 2024 6:10:28 GMT
|
|
moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,378
|
Post by moxohol on Mar 28, 2024 16:48:45 GMT
Meet the new boss same as the old boss...
|
|
moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,378
|
Post by moxohol on Mar 29, 2024 5:27:15 GMT
|
|
|
Post by mr potatohead on Mar 29, 2024 13:18:29 GMT
Meet the new boss same as the old boss... She said that they gather intelligence so that, for one example, they can "arrest people BEFORE they commit a crime". Um ........ what? Sounds like Minority Report to me. ANYONE can be arrested as if a criminal before they've committed any trespass (the only crime there is) against another human's personal property, merely because the "officials" have interpreted communications and decided that they will? So, these arrogant numpties think they can predict the future? (FP emotes are gone, but insert a face palm HERE. Thanks!)
|
|
ilya
Caneguru
Posts: 48
Member is Online
|
Post by ilya on Mar 29, 2024 15:00:48 GMT
Meet the new boss same as the old boss... She said that they gather intelligence so that, for one example, they can "arrest people BEFORE they commit a crime". Um ........ what? Sounds like Minority Report to me. ANYONE can be arrested as if a criminal before they've committed any trespass (the only crime there is) against another human's personal property, merely because the "officials" have interpreted communications and decided that they will? So, these arrogant numpties think they can predict the future? (FP emotes are gone, but insert a face palm HERE. Thanks!) In some cases, it makes perfect sense. If you have people talking on Discord about how they're planning on shooting a school, it would be negligence to avoid checking on them just because they haven't killed anyone yet.
|
|
|
Post by mr potatohead on Mar 29, 2024 20:20:20 GMT
She said that they gather intelligence so that, for one example, they can "arrest people BEFORE they commit a crime". Um ........ what? Sounds like Minority Report to me. ANYONE can be arrested as if a criminal before they've committed any trespass (the only crime there is) against another human's personal property, merely because the "officials" have interpreted communications and decided that they will? So, these arrogant numpties think they can predict the future? (FP emotes are gone, but insert a face palm HERE. Thanks!) In some cases, it makes perfect sense. If you have people talking on Discord about how they're planning on shooting a school, it would be negligence to avoid checking on them just because they haven't killed anyone yet. Keeping an eye on them is prudent, but arresting them is not ok.
|
|
moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,378
|
Post by moxohol on Mar 30, 2024 4:58:02 GMT
It's called "conspiracy". Anything that aids in the furtherance of a crime.
If I openly declare on this forum I want to bang the shit out of someone's hot 13y old daughter because she looks like Cheryl Tiggs & then buy GHB & book a motel room online but set no actionable plan to entice the daughter with a tasty offer of a Friendly's ice cream cone it is still in furtherance of a crime despite I haven't gone thru with it yet. It's probable cause to effect an arrest for CONSPIRACY. U conflate that with "pre-crime".
Hopefully, any guy here who DOES see a 62y old dude declaring a desire to bang their 13y old grand-daughter should be concern enough to warrant action of some kind to interfere, interdict or prohibit the possibility of accomplishing the same. This is under the assumption of having the means, opportunity & likelihood of accomplishing his goals as fact.
|
|
moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,378
|
Post by moxohol on Mar 31, 2024 18:31:12 GMT
|
|
moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,378
|
Post by moxohol on Apr 1, 2024 12:11:15 GMT
|
|
moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,378
|
Post by moxohol on Apr 1, 2024 18:43:50 GMT
|
|
moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,378
|
Post by moxohol on Apr 3, 2024 20:26:28 GMT
WTF is wrong with u Americans? George on X: "BREAKING: Wisconsin election integrity journalist Peter Bernegger was arrested last night and charged with a BOGUS crime. Bernegger has been revealing countless election law violations that have implicated many officials in the state They charged him with “Simulating Legal… t.co/4YvuyVWrMz" / X
|
|
|
Post by mr potatohead on Apr 5, 2024 14:53:28 GMT
It's called "conspiracy". Anything that aids in the furtherance of a crime. If I openly declare on this forum I want to bang the shit out of someone's hot 13y old daughter because she looks like Cheryl Tiggs & then buy GHB & book a motel room online but set no actionable plan to entice the daughter with a tasty offer of a Friendly's ice cream cone it is still in furtherance of a crime despite I haven't gone thru with it yet. It's probable cause to effect an arrest for CONSPIRACY. U conflate that with "pre-crime". Hopefully, any guy here who DOES see a 62y old dude declaring a desire to bang their 13y old grand-daughter should be concern enough to warrant action of some kind to interfere, interdict or prohibit the possibility of accomplishing the same. This is under the assumption of having the means, opportunity & likelihood of accomplishing his goals as fact. There is no crime except that of trespass ..... harming someone or their property. "Probable cause" means that someone has actually witnessed a person committing a crime of trespass - it was not just talk, it was performed and seen by others. That's direct evidence. Indirect or circumstantial evidence of a trespass is "CSI" stuff which is not fully reliable and not to be accepted as eye-witness direct evidence would be. Without a personal eye-witness, there is NO "probable cause". It's just legal-eze mumbo-jumbo deceptive labeling. There is also unintentional trespass, like when a vehicle accident tears up someone yard or something, which will not be charged since there was no harmful intent as long as the person who caused the damage has it repaired.
"Pre-crime" a'la Minority Report is not a crime and cannot be lawfully prosecuted. If a person has not actually trespassed another human, there is no crime. AFTER a crime has been committed (trespass), then any conspirators in the trespass can also be prosecuted, but the commitment of a crime (trespass) must be proven.
You're free to think and talk about whatever you like, but if you have not harmed anyone, stolen from them or harmed anything that they own, you have committed no crime.
|
|