|
Post by mr potatohead on Mar 13, 2024 17:32:31 GMT
With no scientific evidence to present, faith in the fantasy is the basis of virology and the pathogenic "virus" propaganda that has been, and continues to be, taught in the cell biology indoctrination institutions.
You have nothing but faith in the popular consensus claims by "esteemed experts", but no documented scientific experiment - not one - to back up their dogma of any pathogenic "virus".
|
|
moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,378
|
Post by moxohol on Mar 14, 2024 5:49:55 GMT
|
|
moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,378
|
Post by moxohol on Mar 14, 2024 11:30:21 GMT
With no scientific evidence to present, faith in the fantasy is the basis of virology and the pathogenic "virus" propaganda that has been, and continues to be, taught in the cell biology indoctrination institutions. You have nothing but faith in the popular consensus claims by "esteemed experts", but no documented scientific experiment - not one - to back up their dogma of any pathogenic "virus". I'm addressing the comment above about faith as it applies to religion not the unspeakable. Dunno how the unspeakable got inserted here. U could just as well say the earth is flat & challenge anyone to contradict it while dismissing any proof presented for a false construct or premise as entirely inadequate. It's the sterling example of cognitive dissonance. That u know how to boot ur operating system, log online, & use a keyboard is proof positive u are not mentally handicapped just completely divorced from reality on how u process ur facts. That's all. There is wrongful application & then there is stupid. I'll let the forum decide which. Have a nice day Unkle Spuds!
|
|
moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,378
|
Post by moxohol on Mar 14, 2024 22:13:05 GMT
|
|
|
Post by mr potatohead on Mar 15, 2024 8:15:49 GMT
With no scientific evidence to present, faith in the fantasy is the basis of virology and the pathogenic "virus" propaganda that has been, and continues to be, taught in the cell biology indoctrination institutions. You have nothing but faith in the popular consensus claims by "esteemed experts", but no documented scientific experiment - not one - to back up their dogma of any pathogenic "virus". I'm addressing the comment above about faith as it applies to religion not the unspeakable. Dunno how the unspeakable got inserted here. U could just as well say the earth is flat & challenge anyone to contradict it while dismissing any proof presented for a false construct or premise as entirely inadequate.
It's the sterling example of cognitive dissonance.* That u know how to boot ur operating system, log online, & use a keyboard is proof positive u are not mentally handicapped just completely divorced from reality on how u process ur facts. That's all. There is wrongful application & then there is stupid. I'll let the forum decide which. Have a nice day Unkle Spuds! That's not a correct analogy at all.
The claim, which has been made to me and you and the entire world since the '50's at least, is that pathogenic "virus" is real.
Until someone actually does the experiment that proves your claim that pathogenic "virus" exist in nature, get on and into humans and infect them with disease, it must be considered to be a false claim, just like anything else in real science. Merely re-stating group hear-say millions of times in tens of thousands of sciencey-sounding documents does not make it a fact.
Unfortunately for the believers in the pseudo-science cult of "virology", there is not ONE REAL DOCUMENTED SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENT that confirms the existence of any pathogenic "virus". In fact, when one reads the actual documents, it becomes obvious that there is no pathogenic "virus". At its very best, it's just a group agreement, a fantasy, a notion, a cult belief without verification.
You continue to prove that pathogenic "virus" do not exist by refusing to supply even ONE scientifically verified document. If you want anyone to believe your claim, you must provide the evidence.
Facts about anything are not determined or established by consensus or a group vote and it is *"cognitively dissonant" to think that they could be established with documented consensus in place of and displacing all documented scientific experiment showing METHODS and CONTROLS. Facts do not = a group opinion .... and vice-versa. A group vote does NOT provide EVIDENCE of anything except that some people can get together and agree on their cartoon preferences. Making a claim without any evidence is just an opinion no matter how highly esteemed the person or group may be who make the claim.
For facts to be obtained, someone eventually needs to actually do the work.
I'm still asking to see the science document that proves pathogenic "virus" exists in nature, gets into humans and is proven to infect humans with disease. Show the work-done proof, not your, or a group, opinion.
|
|
moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,378
|
Post by moxohol on Mar 15, 2024 11:10:39 GMT
I wasn't addressing anything related about the unspeakable. I directly addressed the question of Scott Ritter, religion & ur cognitive thought processes or lack thereof. Ur applied epistemology is piss poor or else I wouldn't be writing this rebuttal about it.
Reread the thread. U simply inferred I was still on topic about unspeakables. U already have an established written history on this forum of irrational, arrogance & insolence. I've had my go at u & that's it. I'm done with u.
|
|
|
Post by mr potatohead on Mar 15, 2024 13:47:59 GMT
I wasn't addressing anything related about the unspeakable. I directly addressed the question of Scott Ritter, religion & ur cognitive thought processes or lack thereof. Ur applied epistemology is piss poor or else I wouldn't be writing this rebuttal about it. Reread the thread. U simply inferred I was still on topic about unspeakables. U already have an established written history on this forum of irrational, arrogance & insolence. I've had my go at u & that's it. I'm done with u. Thanks for your opinion.I have no clue what you're talking about, mox m8. "Unspeakables"?
I made an observation about a guest post comment on whoever the Ritter guy is (don't remember ever hearing about him before the post of his interview on the previous page).
I watched that interview and was simply indicating that his comment seemed to agree with various scripture references to 'all other nations of the world, gathering against the nation of Israel'. I don't know what happened to the discussion beyond that or what you're commenting on, but it sounds like you're trying to "put words in my post" that I have not written, so it is confusing to me, which may be your idea? I don't know. You then, immediately in your next post, start talking about Ritter's wife? What is that about? Sounds a bit weird, m8.
When it comes to insolence on my part, I can understand that could be your perspective since I refuse to bow down to cartoon fantasies and unproven/unprovable ideas. What is irrational and arrogant is to state your indoctrinated dogma assumptions about pathogenic "virus" fantasy as if they are facts, but provide no objective scientific experimental evidence (as is required for the establishment of any scientific fact) to support that notion coming from the very "experts", group "consensus" and "official" documents assumed as support for the fantasy. They talk all around the issue, but have, not even ONE scientifically conducted experiment that proves a pathogenic "virus" is making humans sick. NOT ...... ONE ...... SCIENTIFIC ....... EXPERIMENT. NOPE, NOT ONE!
|
|
|
Post by unimaginable on Mar 15, 2024 14:16:19 GMT
.....I've had my go at u & that's it. I'm done with u.
|
|
moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,378
|
Post by moxohol on Mar 15, 2024 15:30:19 GMT
Did u ever considered the possibility I'm completely wrong about the unspeakables in the 1st place? Eh? Of course u have but I'm not talking about emotive baseless thinking or butt hurt feelings here because of apparent facts. I'm focusing on how u approach ur topics & arrive at ur own conclusions using that twisted logic of yours. It's called EPISTOMOLOGY (look the goddam word up!). If I used ur same thought processes & applied them at either work or social events they would tar & feather me. Many if not all forum members understand exactly what I'm talking about here even if they won't chime in about it. I don't give a flying rip about the unspeakables anymore. It's beating a dead horse anyways. U exhaust me with ur illogic. Ur in ur trench. I'm in mine. There's nothing more u can say to change my mind about the unspeakables nor vice versa. Yet, I'm more conversant about dealing with stupidity than u. I was immersed in it as a 15y old kid living on a tobacco plantation telling grown older men what to do & when to do it while carrying a weapon around so I didn't make the front page news. What I'm trying to impress upon u by telling u all this seemingly trivial unrelated & non-essential fluff is my circumstances early in life dictated me to discern & think on my feet for myself independent of any adult supervision. It gives sway to cultivating critical thinking at an early age. Don't u think? Something u seem to think u have an exclusive franchise on in the youth of old age. So u can chime in any time u like with ur robotic script of "show me the proof" anytime I mention the unspeakables. I won't take the bait. U are forever wrong about the unspeakables & u will never change my mind on them. End of story.
|
|
|
Post by BigBruvOfEnglandUK on Mar 15, 2024 21:11:07 GMT
I have no clue what you're talking about, mox m8. "Unspeakables"?
For a moment there I thought it might have been that film starring Sylvester Stallone and Jason Statham, m8s
|
|
|
Post by mr potatohead on Mar 16, 2024 5:25:36 GMT
Well then, it's a good thing that all the members here have you to do their thinking and speaking for them, mox m8!
|
|
moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,378
|
Post by moxohol on Mar 16, 2024 14:29:49 GMT
┐( ̄ヘ ̄)┌ ....... t(-_-t)
|
|
Michael
Caneguru
He cuts down trees. He wears high heels, suspendies, and a bra?!
Winner of Twatformetrics Spartan Challenge
Posts: 5,294
|
Post by Michael on Mar 16, 2024 16:23:31 GMT
Who actually wants to engage with You? It's like going down a never ending rabbit hole and never getting out. No one needs anyone to talk for them or think for them on here. I just ignore You because it's a waste of time. It's the way You approach most topics, like Mox said. For a person that quotes the Bible You sure don't walk the talk.
|
|
moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,378
|
Post by moxohol on Mar 16, 2024 18:48:30 GMT
Who actually wants to engage with You? It's like going down a never ending rabbit hole and never getting out. No one needs anyone to talk for them or think for them on here. I just ignore You because it's a waste of time. It's the way You approach most topics, like Mox said. For a person that quotes the Bible You sure don't walk the talk. . ̿̿ ̿̿ ̿̿ ̿'̿'\̵͇̿̿\з= ( ▀ ͜͞ʖ▀) =ε/̵͇̿̿/’̿’̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿̿ ̿̿
|
|
|
Post by BigBruvOfEnglandUK on Mar 17, 2024 0:23:16 GMT
I'm not very familiar with most of the bible but I'm pretty sure it doesn't forbid anyone from disagreeing with another person, m8s?
|
|