|
Post by hagerwf on Nov 8, 2017 18:39:38 GMT
Keep going until Living Strength is published.
|
|
|
Post by Bruce Tackett on Nov 8, 2017 18:44:29 GMT
Looks that way.
|
|
Mr Average
Caneguru
Kegal Grand Master, 8th Dan BlackBelt in Origami, World Champion Couch Potato
Posts: 1,461
|
Post by Mr Average on Nov 8, 2017 18:55:26 GMT
Keep going until Living Strength is published.
|
|
|
Post by BigBruvOfEnglandUK on Nov 9, 2017 9:24:00 GMT
Jake, I really can't be bothered to read your blather any longer. I just scrolled past it because it's just so ridiculous.
|
|
|
Post by fatjake on Nov 9, 2017 9:50:24 GMT
Jake, I really can't be bothered to read your blather any longer. I just scrolled past it because it's just so ridiculous. Im sorry, I dont know what I was thinking, imagine me trying to suggest that if an oxymoron you should be able to just post the definitions of each word and quickly show the contradiction, such ridiculous blather. But I like the fact that, even though you allegedly didnt read my post, you felt the need to tell me about it I think this is done now, if you were right you could have proved it in 30 seconds - two words, two definitions, show a contradiction, done - but you have not been able to show that contradiction. Let me know if anything changes m8 and if you can think of some other contrived explanation to support your "argument", I like a good laugh.
|
|
|
Post by mr potatohead on Nov 9, 2017 13:37:50 GMT
an oxymoron is where contradictory terms are conjoined, so the simplest way to decide if two words qualify as an oxymoron, is to quickly look up the definition of the individual words and see if they are in fact contradictory. It should be pretty easy to do this and take around 30 seconds. Throughout these stupid threads, those pushing for the oxymoron have had plenty of opportunity to show this, but every single definition provided so far, actually shows that there is no contradiction. If it takes days and all sorts of contrived explanations to try and make something into an oxymoron, it amost certainly isnt one. It's been a long, drawn out discussion, only because you want to argue against what is obvious to most, if not everyone, reading on this board. You're very good at arguing by using similar tactics as Gourd, but much more sophisticated. Misunderstanding, misinterpreting, misquoting, convoluting and spinning up my posts by weaving bits and pieces of what I post into your replies. Doing so does not make your argument true that Dynamic Isometric is not oxymoronic, it only shows that you are very good at arguing, m8.
|
|
|
Post by fatjake on Nov 9, 2017 13:42:41 GMT
an oxymoron is where contradictory terms are conjoined, so the simplest way to decide if two words qualify as an oxymoron, is to quickly look up the definition of the individual words and see if they are in fact contradictory. It should be pretty easy to do this and take around 30 seconds. Throughout these stupid threads, those pushing for the oxymoron have had plenty of opportunity to show this, but every single definition provided so far, actually shows that there is no contradiction. If it takes days and all sorts of contrived explanations to try and make something into an oxymoron, it amost certainly isnt one. It's been a long, drawn out discussion, only because you want to argue against what is obvious to most, if not everyone, reading on this board. You're very good at arguing by using similar tactics as Gourd, but much more sophisticated. Misunderstanding, misinterpreting, misquoting, convoluting and spinning up my posts by weaving bits and pieces of what I post into your replies. Doing so does not make your argument true that Dynamic Isometric is not oxymoronic, it only shows that you are very good at arguing, m8. it would be easy to prove me wrong m8, just post the two actual definitions for the two words which show them to be contradictory, it really is that simple, why can't you just do that? Why all the other nonsense?
|
|