|
Post by mr potatohead on Mar 5, 2024 1:53:10 GMT
No wonder they kept saying trust the Science instead of doing your own research. Yeah, "Trust the science". Problem is, there isn't any actual science that proves that any pathogenic "virus" has ever existed.
and, now it's just CGI cartoons, established upon traditional lies, results-manufactured experiments, fantasy and the confusing of health threats with normal bodily detoxification functions.
|
|
moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,377
|
Covid-19
Mar 5, 2024 6:01:57 GMT
via mobile
Post by moxohol on Mar 5, 2024 6:01:57 GMT
Since the 1990s, a cohort study found that over 30% of published papers were fudged or outright lies. The chinese are really bad for this sin. Anytime I post a paper with chinese authors u can bet the farm I cross-referenced that study with Cochrane's Library. However, I must admit the chinese do publish interesting homeopathic(herbs) studies. The polar opposite is who funded the studies. Private/corporate is not necessarily a bad thing despite confirmation bias. Sorting out the integrity issue is vital. So, I use Cochrane's & Sci-hub to search & vet other papers published by authors name. That's simple enough to do. I want to help ppl too not show off my fantastic brain capacity or put my audience to sleep reading long assed excerpts. "WTF are they talking about here.......?" No wonder they kept saying trust the Science instead of doing your own research.
|
|
moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,377
|
Covid-19
Mar 5, 2024 7:46:36 GMT
via mobile
Post by moxohol on Mar 5, 2024 7:46:36 GMT
In virology, Koch's Postulates have been adapted to suit the unique characteristics of viruses. Viruses can't be grown in artificial medium like bacteria. Therefore, modifications have been made to accommodate those challenges. For example, fulfilling Koch's Postulates for viruses involves demonstrating that the virus is present in individuals with the disease, then isolating the virus from infected individuals, & finally reproducing the disease in experimental animals by introducing the isolated virus, and re-isolating the virus from these animals. Dmitry Ivanovsky famously demonstrated the pathogenic nature of viruses in 1892. Specifically, tobacco mosaic disease that affected the russian tobacco plantations of his day & on my dad's plantation too. I always had to keep an eye out for it working in the fields. Martinus Beijerinck made independent discoveries of the same later on & confirmed Ivanovskiy's results. Ref: What does it take to satisfy Koch’s postulates two centuries later? Microbial genomics and Propionibacteria acnes - PMC www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3775492/History of virology - Wikipedia en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_virologyIvanovskiy Institute virology.gamaleya.org/en/common/biografiya-d-i-ivanovskogo/Martinus Beijerinck - Wikipedia en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martinus_Beijerinck
|
|
|
Post by mr potatohead on Mar 5, 2024 15:52:12 GMT
OK then, here is proof for you that Mickey Mouse is real.No need for me to present any scientifically documented experiment to prove the existence of the Mouse either ("either" in like manner, comparison).Just declare it to be so, that's good enough for you, right m8?Please post one documented scientific experiment paper that proves that a pathogenic "virus" exists in the environment and that it invades and infects humans?
|
|
moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,377
|
Post by moxohol on Mar 5, 2024 19:56:20 GMT
|
|
|
Post by mr potatohead on Mar 5, 2024 22:15:02 GMT
Please post one documented scientific experiment paper (English, please, thank you!) that proves that a pathogenic "virus" exists in the environment and that it invades and infects humans?
|
|
moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,377
|
Post by moxohol on Mar 6, 2024 8:53:22 GMT
|
|
|
Post by mr potatohead on Mar 6, 2024 9:25:08 GMT
There are tens of thousands of pseudo-science papers that make references to "viruses", so you can post that kind of UN-informative, fantasy nonsense for years, m8. The pseudo-science-posers are writing papers from a POV that pathogenic "viruses" have already been proven to exist. It is ridiculous to say, "We did thus and so with the virus" when the first thing that MUST be shown is that a pathogenic "virus" exists at all; that they have isolated it to be by itself and, alone, it has done what they claim pathogenic "virus" does in nature - i.e. that it performs as advertised in those 10's of 1,000's (over 50,000?) of pseudo-scientific papers that claim they "did thus and so with a "virus".
SO, what we all need to see is that .... (or as many actual documented experiments as you can find - I heard there are only 5 and I've read 3) .... ONE documented EXPERIMENT, detailing the METHODS and CONTROLS used in the experimental process. That's standard for any scientific evidence of anything in the materialistic world ------ or are you trying to suggest that the "virus" is just so ethereal, elusive and ghostly that it takes a team of "highly-spiritual"-fear-mongering-imagineering-ghost-hustlers to fake it ---- you know, make it media-ready and friendly ------ and that it's actual existence must just be "assumed" and "believed" ..... which is a pseudo-science cult. (Indeed, it appears that a consensus cult is all they currently have. All those fakers gather together and decide, "Oh yes, that sounds good. Let's call that true, whaddaya say guys? Alright now, let's get busy and crank out 50,000 papers to keep those pesky truth seekers busy going down rabbit holes so that they learn nothing of value.")
Without(?) that actual experiment document, detailing the process used in the experiment, the actual how-they-did-the-experiment evidence, without that, you have nothing except more pseudo-scientists jerking each other off.
What you need to post, IN FULL, for evaluation is:
One, fully documented, authentic, scientific experiment paper (English, please, thank you!) that proves that a pathogenic "virus" exists in the environment and that it invades and infects humans as advertised?
Perhaps you're having difficulty understanding what a real documented, authentic, real science experiment paper is, and that details exactly how the experiment was conducted to give meaningful and REPEATABLE results?
|
|
moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,377
|
Covid-19
Mar 6, 2024 14:53:09 GMT
via mobile
Post by moxohol on Mar 6, 2024 14:53:09 GMT
There are tens of thousands of pseudo-science papers that make references to "viruses", so you can post that kind of UN-informative, fantasy nonsense for years, m8.The pseudo-science-posers are writing papers from a POV that pathogenic "viruses" have already been proven to exist. It is ridiculous to say, "We did thus and so with the virus" when the first thing that MUST be shown is that a pathogenic "virus" exists at all; that they have isolated it to be by itself and, alone, it has done what they claim pathogenic "virus" does in nature - i.e. that it performs as advertised in those 10's of 1,000's (over 50,000?) of pseudo-scientific papers that claim they "did thus and so with a "virus". SO, what we all need to see is that .... (or as many actual documented experiments as you can find - I heard there are only 5 and I've read 3) .... ONE documented EXPERIMENT, detailing the METHODS and CONTROLS used in the experimental process.That's standard for any scientific evidence of anything in the materialistic world ------ or are you trying to suggest that the "virus" is just so ethereal, elusive and ghostly that it takes a team of "highly-spiritual"-fear-mongering-imagineering-ghost-hustlers to fake it ---- you know, make it media-ready and friendly ------ and that it's actual existence must just be "assumed" and "believed" ..... which is a pseudo-science cult. (Indeed, it appears that a consensus cult is all they currently have. All those fakers gather together and decide, "Oh yes, that sounds good. Let's call that true, whaddaya say guys? Alright now, let's get busy and crank out 50,000 papers to keep those pesky truth seekers busy going down rabbit holes so that they learn nothing of value.")Without(?) that actual experiment document, detailing the process used in the experiment, the actual how-they-did-the-experiment evidence, without that, you have nothing except more pseudo-scientists jerking each other off.What you need to post, IN FULL, for evaluation is:One, fully documented, authentic, scientific experiment paper (English, please, thank you!) that proves that a pathogenic "virus" exists in the environment and that it invades and infects humans as advertised?Perhaps you're having difficulty understanding what a real documented, authentic, real science experiment paper is, and that details exactly how the experiment was conducted to give meaningful and REPEATABLE results? On Stupidity | Sierra Exercise sierraexercise.proboards.com/thread/4547/on-stupidity
|
|
brothersteve
Caneguru
He ain't heavy, he's my brother
Posts: 2,267
|
Post by brothersteve on Mar 6, 2024 15:53:43 GMT
Well guys, I saw on the NEWS yesterday they are pushing for folks to get vaxxed for covid stating over 1,000 die daily from this still....so there!
|
|
|
Post by BigBruvOfEnglandUK on Mar 6, 2024 19:20:37 GMT
According to Worldometer there's been something like 100 deaths recently with covid every day in the US that has a population of over 330 million. When you start seeing loads of people around your own age dying of something in particular maybe then is the time to start worrying about it? www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/
|
|
pierinifitness
Caneguru
I do burpees, then I drink slurpees
Posts: 2,727
|
Post by pierinifitness on Mar 16, 2024 20:54:10 GMT
|
|
|
Post by BigBruvOfEnglandUK on Mar 16, 2024 23:28:54 GMT
Who would have guessed that putting people out of work and halting children's education would do more harm than good? They definitely had ulterior motives.
|
|
moxohol
Caneguru
Biohacker
Quod tu es, ego fui. Quod ego sum, tu eris.
Posts: 3,377
|
Post by moxohol on Mar 18, 2024 18:08:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by mr potatohead on Mar 19, 2024 10:06:59 GMT
McCullough has lots of "works of art" to show. Funny how there are multiple CGI cartoon images, IMAGINING what a pathogenic "virus" MIGHT look like ..... if they could find one. That's another way to know that they don't exist. If they did exist, all of the cartoons would have the same appearance because they would KNOW what they look like, no need for each digital graphic artist to just subjectively and individually make it up since and all images would be identical - IF it was a real thing. Every cartoon animator has a different idea of what a pathogenic "virus" MIGHT look like. but everyone's cartoon is different because they've never found and identified one.
The US and everyone else should just tell the truth. There is no scientifically conducted experiment document that proves the existence of any pathogenic, humanly contagious "virus" on Earth and never has been.
No need for any preventative intervention in the first place .... except to eat real food and tend to your own health.
Threat GONE!
"Virology" finished as a valid science. It's become obvious now that it's nothing more than fantasy pseudo-science. Why? Because THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF ANY PATHOGENIC "VIRUS", m8s!
|
|