|
Post by guyincognito on Jan 31, 2020 21:11:40 GMT
And another... www.physiology.org/doi/abs/10.1152/jappl.1957.11.1.29Effect of Static and Dynamic Exercises on Muscular Strength and Hypertrophy Philip J. Rasch, and Laurence E. Morehouse Abstract The effects of 6-week programs of isotonic and isometric exercises were observed in 49 male subjects. The 24 subjects who performed isotonic exercises showed greater gains in strength and hypertrophy than did the 25 subjects who exercised isometrically. Tests of strength were performed both in a position similar to that in which subjects were exercised and also in an unfamiliar position. In addition, tests were used which employed the musculature in a familiar and in an unfamiliar manner. Whereas subjects showed strength gains in the tests when muscles were employed in a familiar way, little or no gain in strength was observed when unfamiliar procedures were employed. The findings suggest that the higher scores in strength tests resulting from the exercise programs reflected largely the acquisition of skill. Submitted on September 7, 1956
|
|
Dave Reslo
Caneguru
Not quite severely obese
Posts: 1,465
|
Post by Dave Reslo on Feb 1, 2020 14:16:12 GMT
Well, now I don't know what to believe.
|
|
|
Post by fredhutch on Feb 1, 2020 16:00:48 GMT
The Carryover problem rears its ugly head.
|
|
pierinifitness
Caneguru
I do burpees, then I drink slurpees
Posts: 2,713
|
Post by pierinifitness on Feb 1, 2020 16:06:54 GMT
Best to conduct our own study.
Test overhead press using a barbell, one-rep max.
Do isometrics for study period.
Retest.
Allow strength erosion until your one-rep max is same as above.
Do barbell work for same study period.
Test one-rep max.
Compare the two.
Publish results.
Done.
|
|
|
Post by guyincognito on Feb 1, 2020 20:31:35 GMT
I like the idea that strength is ultimately a skill.
|
|
|
Post by chanduthemagician on Feb 2, 2020 4:03:55 GMT
I like the idea that strength is ultimately a skill. It certainly is to an extent. If I were to only do pec deck flyes eventually my bench would go up because my pecs were stronger, but because I didn't work the bench movement I wouldn't also get the corresponding shoulder strength and tricep strength to help wit the movement. Even if I worked triceps and shoulders seperately it still wouldn't be as good as actually training the bench press. The training the bench press trains all musculature involved in that movement in the way that it is used. PLUS I get the skill component that is missing if I just train the individual muscles. It always bothers me when some write off an exercise or training method because they did it and some pet lift of theirs didn't go up because of it. They'll bitch I did the Bullworker and my bench didn't go up. Bullworker sucks! I NEVER see. I trained bench press for three months and I still suck at the Bullworker. Benchpress sucks! As always if you want to improve at a certain thing you have to at least practice that certain thing regardless of what else you might be doing. Specificity. Now, if you are training for sheer size and don't care about performance in any particular movement, all that goes out the window and you should do what makes you grow the fastest, and don't assume that it will be large multiple joint movements.
|
|